Skip to main content
Lawgical Law
Corporation

Published

Sundeep S. Grewal is a lawyer at Lawgical Law Corporation, called to the BC bar in 2018, and a member of the Law Society of British Columbia.

Updated November 10, 2026: section 36 of the Act, sections 320.13, 320.14 and 320.19 of the Criminal Code, RCW 46.61.500 and 46.61.5249, and section 144 of BC’s Motor Vehicle Act checked that day.

The fix: compare the exact Washington offence and facts with Canadian law before you travel. If it counts, a temporary resident permit for the trip and rehabilitation when eligible; if not, carry the records and an explanation.

The deadline: none, but plan before the trip. A refusal at the border is recorded.

Why a lawyer: the same plea can be treated very differently depending on the statute, the charging language and whether alcohol was involved. Why a lawyer

Book a consultation

The lawyers who handle these files

Sundeep S. Grewal, Barrister and SolicitorSundeep S. GrewalBarrister and SolicitorPrabhpreet Kaur Sangha, Barrister and SolicitorPrabhpreet Kaur SanghaBarrister and SolicitorPardeep S. Grewal, Barrister and SolicitorPardeep S. GrewalBarrister and Solicitor
About our lawyers

Sundeep S. Grewal founded Lawgical Law Corporation and argues immigration cases at the Immigration and Refugee Board and the Federal Court of Canada.

Prabhpreet Kaur Sangha focuses on refugee claims, immigration appeals, inadmissibility, detention reviews and Federal Court cases, and has presented at Continuing Legal Education seminars and the National Immigration Conference.

Pardeep S. Grewal is an immigration and estates lawyer known for clear communication and practical strategy.

If you were convicted of reckless driving or negligent driving in Washington, often after a DUI charge was reduced, you may still have a problem entering Canada. Canada compares the foreign offence with Canadian criminal law. Reckless driving in Washington means driving “in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property”, which can look like dangerous operation of a conveyance in the Criminal Code, an offence with a maximum of 10 years. Negligent driving in the first degree involves driving negligently while showing the effects of alcohol, cannabis or drugs, and how Canada treats it depends on the facts. Careless driving that would only break a provincial traffic law in Canada does not make you inadmissible.

Lawgical Law Corporation, an immigration law firm in Surrey, Abbotsford and Vancouver, BC, near the Washington crossings, advises US drivers with criminal records on entering Canada; this guide is by Sundeep S. Grewal.

Book a consultation about entering Canada with a DUI TapClick to open a short form. Our team will contact you to arrange a time.Short form, 4 quick fields Open form

How does Canada compare the offence?

Reckless driving (RCW 46.61.500, a gross misdemeanor of up to 364 days in jail). A Washington reckless driving conviction can be equivalent to dangerous operation under section 320.13 of the Criminal Code, which carries up to 10 years, if the evidence shows the driving was dangerous to the public and a marked departure from how a reasonable driver would have driven in the circumstances. The Washington offence is broader than the Canadian one, so the facts matter. If the conduct amounts only to a provincial traffic offence, such as driving without due care and attention under section 144 of BC’s Motor Vehicle Act, it does not create criminal inadmissibility under section 36.

Negligent driving in the first degree (RCW 46.61.5249, a misdemeanor). It requires negligent driving that endangers or is likely to endanger a person or property, together with signs of alcohol, drug or other intoxicant use. Washington can prove those signs with evidence such as an odour of alcohol and recent use. Canadian impaired operation under section 320.14(1)(a) requires that your ability to drive was actually impaired, even slightly. So the conviction may be equivalent to impaired operation if the evidence shows impairment, or to dangerous operation if the driving itself meets the test above. The fact that the original charge was a DUI does not, on its own, establish either Canadian offence.

Why this needs a lawyer

One lawyer, one file, every step:

  • comparing the Washington statute, charging language and facts with Canadian law;
  • a written opinion you can carry if the offence has no Canadian equivalent;
  • a temporary resident permit if it does and you must travel;
  • criminal rehabilitation once you are eligible.

Immigration lawyers are members of a provincial law society (in our case, the Law Society of British Columbia), and only lawyers can appear for you in the Federal Court.

What are my options?

  1. Get the full court file: the original charge, the amended charge, the plea statement and the judgment.
  2. Get an equivalency opinion before you travel, especially if the charge started as a DUI.
  3. If it counts, a temporary resident permit for the trip.
  4. Criminal rehabilitation once at least five years have passed since the whole sentence was completed.
  5. If it does not count, carry the records and the opinion and answer CBSA’s questions honestly.

Washington driving offences at a glance

Washington offence What it requires Possible Canadian comparison
Reckless driving (gross misdemeanor) Willful or wanton disregard for safety Dangerous operation (up to 10 years) if the driving was a marked departure; otherwise possibly provincial only
Negligent driving, first degree (misdemeanor) Negligent driving with signs of alcohol or drugs Impaired or dangerous operation only if the evidence shows impairment or dangerous driving
DUI Impairment or a blood alcohol limit Impaired operation (up to 10 years)
Careless driving in BC Driving without due care Provincial only; not criminal inadmissibility

Worked example: the reduced charge

Example. A Bellingham driver charged with DUI in 2021 pleaded guilty to negligent driving in the first degree. Before a trip to Vancouver on Friday, February 5, 2027, she gets the original charge, the amended charge and her plea statement. Her lawyer checks whether the record shows actual impairment or dangerous driving, compares it with Canadian law and writes a short opinion. She carries the documents and answers CBSA’s questions honestly.

Mistakes I have seen

  • I have seen drivers assume a reduced charge means “no record” for Canada.
  • I have seen drivers bring only the final judgment, without the plea statement that shows the facts.
  • I have seen drivers wait until a refusal at Peace Arch before getting advice.

Frequently asked questions

Is a “wet reckless” treated like a DUI?

Not necessarily. It depends on the statute and on what you admitted in the plea. The documents matter more than the label.

I did a deferred prosecution in Washington. Does that help?

It has its own rules. See our guide on Washington DUI deferred prosecution.

Can I be deemed rehabilitated?

Possibly, for a single old offence whose Canadian equivalent carries a maximum under 10 years, 10 years after the sentence was completed. Dangerous operation now carries 10 years, so the offence date matters.

See our guides on entering Canada with a DUI, a pending US DUI charge and being turned back at a BC crossing.

What should I do right now?

Order the complete court file, including the original charge and plea statement. Note when your sentence was completed. Get an opinion before your next trip.

Book a consultation with our immigration lawyers in Surrey, Abbotsford or Vancouver, or online from anywhere.

Ready to book? Open the booking form ↑

Sources (official)

This article is general information, not legal advice. Every case depends on its own facts.